• 26 Posts
  • 520 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2024

help-circle


  • Die Geologie deutet schon vielfach auf Süddeutschland.

    Wenn im GG verankert würde, dass ausschließlich nach Eignung und ohne Politik entschieden wird, wäre das auch denkbar. Nur wird das wahrscheinlich noch weniger von der Politik aus der Hand gegeben als zumindest den Einfluss best. Länder zu begrenzen.

    Wenn es der Politik überlassen wird, landet ein Endlager am Ende in jedem Fall dort, wo man politisch zum Zeitpunkt der Entscheidung am schwächsten ist.


  • Und diese Bundesländer haben auch Strom aus anderen Ländern bezogen. Die Steuereinnahmen, Subventionen, Arbeitsplätze usw. sind jeweils im Bundesland des Kraftwerksstandortes angefallen.

    Mit Bayern haben wir ein Bundesland, dass einerseits laut die Verlängerung der Atomkraft forderte und gleichzeitig Endlagerung kategorisch ausgeschlossen hat. Das dürfen sich die anderen 15 Bundesländer nicht bieten lassen. Es muss klar sein, dass wer von der Atomkraft am meisten profitiert hat auch am meisten für die Entsorgung leisten muss.


  • It was quite funny when the candidate race started and Trump wasn’t rerunning yet and the FBI raided Mar a Lago for the stolen files. The sentiment was usually something along the lines of

    “yeah Trump was not perfect and we always said this and we of course always let the authorities do their job, but also they should raid Biden and if Trump is convicted he is not a good president, but there is candidate x,y that is totally amazing.”

    Sometimes i wonder how much of it are just shills, how much it is people who suffer form serious cognitive issues and how much it is people who are aware but fine with lying to themselves constantly.


  • Das war schon vor Jahren klar, als es hieß, der Prozess solle nach wissenschaftlichen Kriterien erfolgen, aber dann das Parlament immer wieder mitentscheiden. Am Ende ist der Prozess eine weitere Verlagerung politischer Entscheidungen in die Zukunft. Nur wird dann in der Zukunft die Entscheidung wieder in die Zukunft gelegt werden, weil natürlich keiner den Müll haben will.

    Ich denke wir bräuchten eine gesetzliche Regelung, vorzugsweise im Grundgesetz, dass die Suche nach geeigneten Lagerstätten nur in den Bundesländern erfolgt, die auch aktiv Kernkraftwerke betrieben haben. Weiterhin sollten die anderen Bundesländer mit ehemaligen Kraftwerken an den Kosten beteiligt werden und eine “Miete” anteilig nach der erzeugten Strommenge zahlen.


  • It is not a matter of opinion. It is a strong reduction of the rights of the affected people.

    It is a simple matter of fact and it doesn’t warrant indirect language irrespective of political affiliations. If someone supports this legislation it is precisely because they want to reduce the rights of the affected people. Whether that is a morally, ethically or legally good or bad thing to do can be subjective. I.e. “Hungarys ban on LGBT public events is considered “evil” by rights group.” Or “Hungarys ban on LGBT public events is hailed for protection of family values by conservative think tank” would be headlines where a subjective wording would be appropriate.


  • There is also people who just hang on their phone all day or gossip in the kitchen. I have seen that in the best and in the worst working conditions.

    There is good reason, why the principle “same pay for same work” usually does not include surveillance of productivity. But it does feel infuriating to not make 3x as much despite having 3x the productivity of some people that have a similar or even higher salary thanks to seniority, when i am basically financing their lack of productivity.

    I agree that the term “laziness” is often used by management to shift blame onto the workers and i don’t know how a solution could look like that would address real laziness without infringing on workers rights.



  • Its the particle filter that needs a good burning every once in a while. Otherwise it gets clogged and can’t filter anymore and also reduces your exhaust flow.

    It is indeed a problem with many diesel cars that are only used for city drives. As for the driving itself diesel is more chill than gasoline because the maximum torque is reached at lower rpm and it is more difficult to stall the engine than a gasoline engine so manual gear is easier.




  • The way i see it, if Amazon want’s to close down its data centers, they either have to pay a lot to get the infrastructure out and ship it to a different region. Then a building predestined as a data center is available for a european company. Or they sell the building and infrastructure and a european company can get a fully equipped data center for cheap. Or Amazon just pays proper taxes as it doesn’t want to lose access to the EU market.









  • Saleh@feddit.orgtoScience Memes@mander.xyznature is music
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What is your evidence of genetics? Unless you are a biochemist and have run experiments yourself, it will boil down to “somebody told me/I have read it in a book”. So your evidence boils down to a chain of narration. Which narrators you trust or distrust is a subjective matter.

    Genetics are a great example though. Modern genetics are often perceived to start with the work of Mendel in the 19th century. Imagine instead of being taught about genetics in school and maybe later in university, you would have lived in the 17th century. Would you have rejected the concept of genes as “fairy tale” because there was no evidence you deemed credible available?

    What about atomic models? Would you have considered them to be “fairy tales” prior to the developments of the late 19th and early 20th century? What about how atom models changed? Would you mock Nils Bohr because his atomic model became partly obsolete with the work of Heisenberg? Did you do any of the experiments which lead to the developments of atomic models yourself?

    So in practice the only scientific approach is to say: “I have neither evidence that convinces me for or against it, therefore i don’t know”. Saying something is false or does not exist because you don’t see evidence for it, is a matter of faith, rather than a matter of science.

    EDIT: As for the experiments, i had both the typical experiments for genetics in biochemistry and for atoms in physics lectures for my engineering degree. As for narrations there exist plenty of evidence for the life and work of the prophet Mohamed (sas.). Whether you accept it as evidence of prophethood is a subjective matter, just like it is a subjective matter if you believe your biology or your physics textbook, unless you have verified this information by your own experiments.