edgy teenage bullshit argument

Yeah Support is horrible work, I don’t maintain anything, but I ask stupid questions, which I don’t know are stupid until I get the answer and than die of shame.

I don’t know if AI can fix that and most maintainers I had to ask for help were really helpful and friendly, but maintainance like keeping software compatible with used libraries, helping users and such is invisible work.

Ah the Linux help desk where you get helpful directions like “You have a problem with your dual monitor setup in your naively installed Ubuntu setup? Have you considered installing a rust micro kernel from an abandoned GitHub repo? After cherry picking some patches from a mailinglist? Also boon plep Ubuntu looser.”

Why are you arguing in favor of parties that want to infringe on people’s human rights?

I fail to see how any movement of change within the spectrum of a constitution based on human rights would be negatively affected by the deligtimisation of anti-humanist factions.

What do oligarchs have to do with that anyway?

How does any of that lead into dictatorship?

What about separation of power?

What about other means of political influence, like wide spread worker strikes, those wouldn’t be affected by the dismantling of political parties.

Why the fuck are people spouting libertarian nonsense in defense of fascism?

And pertaining to the gulag: no you.

No. The tolerance paradox generally is interpreted to mean that any tolerant society that tolerates intolerance destroys itself. See Wikipedia first paragraph tolerance paradox. Any serious democratic constitution bases itself on humanism and the idea that human rights cannot be infringed on except to protect the human rights of others. Allowing participants in political discussions who question that is outright fucking stupid. They must be excluded, deconstructed, and fought in the streets if necessary. Using the US as an example for anything democracy related is on the same level as using China as an example for well implemented communism.

That’s astonishing bullshit. There is already a process for ban political parties with political alignments incompatible with the constitution, which has to be initialized by o e of the two chambers of parliament and decided by the constitutional court. Having a political instrument in addition to that will automatically reduce the hurdle of dismantling political movements, for blurry definitions of “sufficient amount of extremists in a party”.

Nah, that’s the paradox of tolerance. A democracy cannot allow fascists to run without dismantling itself. Also fascism and other “political views” that dehumanize are not a political view, they are chargeable criminal offenses in many countries.

Transparent Windows are like scifi where they print stuff on see through foil. How the fuck is anybody even able to read this?

The edgy teenage atheism blues. A classic.

Plastic in my gut

Plastic in my lung

And the other too

Plastic in my blood

Plastic plastic

Plastic in my wiener

And in my seed

Plastic in my telephone

Plastic in my brain

Plastic plastic

Brain plastic

[Edit formatting is hard]

It also includes a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license for the purpose of doing as you request with the content you input in Firefox. This does not give Mozilla any ownership in that content.

It’s still in the current version of the TOS without a direct explanation which can be found anywhere close to it. This is plain bad from a communication stand point.

To be fair nobody asked Mozilla to serve a stupid and detached statement without contextualizing what they meant or try to achieve.

[Edit] it feels like they’re asking for the outrage. You can’t just drop assurances of not selling data without explaining if your crowd is privacy aware. You can’t take broad licenses from your users if you don’t explain for what they are for. Having plaintext comment next to the lawyer speak would have fixed all that and none of this had to be this shitty. [/Edit]

I don’t know who would make for a good Gollum, but as for what goes into Mt doom, everything, the whole planet, straight into the volcano.

Foucalt would probably be opinionated on this.

Well so is torture

There are four lights! 💡💡💡💡

It feels like a potential security nightmare. If your desktop at work is compromised and you have your domain admin come over and take a look; they might decide not to elevate the whole session, exercising appropriate caution and protocol in doing so, but just wing it with a quick sudo !! because the previous command didn’t go through.

I don’t quite remember if this works properly, but I think !! should expand to sudo “previous command” at least in bash.

Best comment I read in a long time ❤️

Workers unaware of class struggle

I mean don’t you prove his point, by pointing out that all governments that call themselves communist are “so called communist governments”? So they aren’t doing communism right, else they could call themselves rightfully communist.

I do share the notion that communism is an ideology or economic system that is supposed to liberate people from class war. So it should be a liberating force. Suppressing dissent, free media, and casually engaging in imperialism and ethnic cleansing is not what I’d imagine a liberating government would do.

Obviously democracies with “free markets” also have these pitfalls. Not to say that both are equally wrong, but both are surely not the implementation of its self proclaimed ideals.