Or rather “blow” to “suck” in this case
Or rather “blow” to “suck” in this case
Yeah, they were railing against scientists in another thread, technocrit is braindead
I think you answered your own question: there is no non-sexual nudity in such a hyper-sexual society.
Yeah, he already did this in the general, no one gave a shit.
Pretty sure that would just look like Mr. Potato Head
Yeah, they never existed to begin with, sowwy
Could be a park with camping sites, gotta pay to stay, get firewood, rent recreational equipment, etc.
This is like bemoaning the fact that doctors don’t treat “the humors” anymore. We gained knowledge that invalidated what we thought we knew, so we’ve updated our understanding. Unless you’re a taxonomical marine biologist, it’s really very unimportant anyway, I wouldn’t worry about it.
We don’t lack a definition, we actually just have so many narrower definitions that we don’t need one for “fish” anymore. The old, broad definitions become archaic and often inaccurate as we gain more knowledge.
“Yes, I’d like two C batteries please.”
“Then look at them, stupid.”
Because that’s how they’re made
Use cream of celery or cream of chicken even.
I don’t know what you’re disagreeing with, you didn’t address anything I said. Your misguided opinion on brandname gatekeeping doesn’t stop French’s fried onions from being French fried onions, so it just seems irrelevant.
Just because they’re not called French’s French Fried Onions doesn’t mean they aren’t French fried onions.
It’s definitely also the name of the manner in which they’re cooked though, at least regionally here in the US.
Yeah I’m just gonna say it, that looks fucking delicious, S-tier side dish
Maybe it’s the sunglasses throwing them off
I find that if I don’t know what a word means, looking up the definition really helps fix that.
Sorry, technocrit is contextually braindead.