Speak for yourself
Speak for yourself
You support war crimes?
Also I feel like the bare metal ones would collect a bunch of mud inside filtering through the gaps and affecting the balance.
Here the more pragmatic use of truth is being used, which most of the people would agree in its objectiveness. Either the real person did the call or not.
Even in the philosophical concept of truth different schools of thoughts have different views on its objectiveness. Here is a better resource I think.
Capital and price are imaginary. Why are you evaluating a system by random concepts that don’t correspond to anything real?
Maybe use a metric with actual real meaning like fraction of people with basic necessities covered.
Now we only have child miners, child slaughter house workers, child assembly line workers, child scrapyard garbage collectors, …
Yes. Photography captures an instant of the real world. The photographer still has to choose the moment, perspective, composition, filters and so on, but they are very constrained (not as much as AI prompters).
The debate about the artistic involvement of photography has existed sonce the invention of the camera, it’s not something new.
There is some technical skill involved in making it output something in the direction you want, but nothing exists until you hit enter, only a vague concept. The process is so detached from the artistic decision making that it is a complete outstrech to call it art. You can never have a personal style doing AI stuff. No vision, no nuances.
Writing prompts for an image generator doesn’t make you an artist, lol
You just described neofeudalism and “anarcho”-capitalism. Those don’t have anything to do with anarchism, just americans muddying the waters by trying to confuse semantics.
Yes, we do. It’s called anarchism. It’s literally what it is for.
From which less than 1% is electrified and don’t even mention high speed networks