This made me chuckle

Is this what’s meant by the null hypothesis?

You can help by expanding it

Eh, depends. If it’s the around-the-neck kind of crystals, no way. If it’s in a radio circuit, now, that’s a different story.

Seitan is cool but I really want to try jack fruit

I prefer writing in “Satan” over leaving it blank

Great, now that song is going to be in my head all day

based

And with that, FiskFisk33 was enlightened.

Certainly, I don’t disagree with that at all. And that’s likely part of the reason so few people publish failures, because there’s no “reward”. All I was saying is there’s still value there.

I wish more people would publish their failures. Definitive proof that a hypothesis is wrong is just as solid a result as definitive proof the hypothesis is right.

I hate that I can’t photosynthesize.

our our

Ok but a soda or carbonated water that has lost most of its target fizzyness quotient (scientific term) is still regarded as being flat even if it has some carbonation left. If it were a sliding scale instead of “a” vs “b”, then we could imagine a “locally flat” taste profile while admitting that the whole is not entirely flat. Which is a perfect description of Earth’s geometry.

I learned cursory electronics and circuits in my physics curriculum.

FULL BRIDGE RECTIFIER

Being a lit review, it’s not a referreed publication, so no one to call them out on their bullshit. Funny that the author didn’t even bother reading their shit sandwich of a “review”.

Paging @pm_me_your_foucaults

Did you just assume that skeleton’s gender?