Isn’t this kind of posting just feeding into said noise machine?
Isn’t this kind of posting just feeding into said noise machine?
If the thing in question is changed, and the only part of us that can directly affect is our opinion, then I would call that a social construction.
We define what existence is. We have all collectively agreed that being here in the perceptible world means that something exists. We could choose to include the imaginary in its definition and then would be able to say that dragons and wizards exist. We could also choose to say something has to be present in 4 dimensions to exist, in which case we’d not be able to say that anything exists.
A social construct is simply an idea that has been created and accepted by the people in a society which includes the dictionary itself. I’d also say that these definitions are often useful at allowing us to communicate and cooperate with one another, but that doesn’t mean we didn’t make up the idea.
Our naming and classification of things is all socially constructed. So yes, our categorization of edible things as food is a social construct, but our physical need to fuel our bodies with something digestible is not. But also, using it that way makes existence a social construct, so it depends on how rigid you want to be.
Here’s my opinion of how to try a bagel in its most classic format, me being someone from the northeast but not New York. Everything bagel, cut in half (like a sandwich), toasted, smear each open face with plain cream cheese (can substitute for veggie cream cheese), eat each half separately.
Otherwise it’s just a different shape of bread like ciabatta or baguette. Personally I don’t love bagels for sandwiches because they tend to not hold up structurally, but bagel is my favorite context for cream cheese.
Again?!
Who’s going to post that 2 nickels meme?
The USA first needs a serious left wing party for that to be possible.
Am I reading the article correctly when I put the dividing line between right wing and left wing somewhere in the “other” section?
I don’t agree with now being the time, given who that would be. But I do think it would be good to elect a convicted felon to the white house at some point.
That’s just a safety tip
I was about to question the “zionist left” part and decided to do a quick search. Apparently it’s real, one of the largest parties in Israel is the “Labor Zionist” party which actually holds certain leftist values like proletarian* ownership of the means of production. Bibi is a right wing liberal all the way and his party reflects that, just to be clear. But it shows how any movement can be devastating and harmful when it adopts a mentality of exclusion. In the case of the LZ party, it’s the *Jewish proletariat that they want to build socialism for, while keeping an underclass of gentiles. So once again racism and hierarchies are here to ruin your movement.
Yes. When I think of a just system it’s more like…
Person commits crime and goes to rehabilitation, if they can’t be rehabilitated then they are imprisoned or exiled, if they are still a threat there that’s when it may become necessary to execute. It’s not a punishment, it’s a last resort for the safety of others.
Children also don’t feel shame about being naked until they gain the knowledge of sexuality. Parents would probably notice a child covering themselves up after an encounter of that nature.
I’m also assuming the story would be altered in a number of ways to change the meaning to the biblical one.
For a dog example, a black lab (with dark skin) is more genetically similar to a yellow lab (with light skin) than a black pomeranian (with dark skin).
Username checks out
This one’s actually pronounced with a soft j
There’s certainly a difference in domestic policy that makes it clear what choice to make when we’re forced into this idiotic 2 party situation. There isn’t much of a difference when it comes to foreign policy, so the rest of the world doesn’t really care which of “the 2 parties” we pick. Maybe there are too few options, and maybe we shouldn’t blindly support one guy just because the other guy is worse.
Seriously I don’t understand how Biden isn’t a shoo in. He’s such an old school conservative centrist lowest common denominator. The general public would shit their pants if we actually had a president with morals.
Just proof of the necessity of that little /s
That’s actually pretty good. Maybe it’ll say something?