You may have missed the sort of “inversion” from the irony in the initial comment. The monitoring of the CCP and the love of a woman both have innate levels of “goodness”, and one is very clearly well above the other. The initial comment is funny because it flips that apparent heirarchy on its head. The reply then asserts that, in fact, the two are comparable in “goodness”, which moves the love of a woman “up” towards the “goodness” of the CCP. More simply, saying “You’ve clearly never been married” here implies that, in fact, the love of a woman can compare to the monitoring and scoring of the Chinese government. This is a comparison which paints the love of a woman in a bad light.
I have no idea if this comment makes sense, and may need a diagram.
OK Boomer
The more properties you own, the more tax you pay on the price of the next one - excluding if you only own one, but escalating quickly after like 3 or 4.
Incredible
Legit, I’ll take this over the undocumented spaghetti I too often see written by “professionals”.
I really love that Trump was Ruled to have committed 34 felonies because it means that at least one unknowing person has Googled “Trump rule/ruled/ruling 34”
Edit: come to think of it, that’s a fun conspiracy, like the “Walt Disney Frozen” thing…
Unfortunately I haven’t yet convinced all my friends to go elsewhere, so I still need it as a communication platform
Opening Instagram instead of Lemmy or Mastodon :(
Paul, John, George, and Ringo were 4 friends, and they were all Beatles, so I think they might have skewed this data a little?
That they play monopoly?