BadlyDrawnRhino

deleted by creator

For context, the conservative party here in Aus is pushing hard for a transition to nuclear power, rather than renewables.

At least here in Australia, we believe in the right for a select group of billionaires to make money off the land in the form of coal mining, and renewable energy threatens that right.

Now that the world is turning away from coal as much as possible, we’re now pivoting to allow a select group of billionaires to make money off the land in the form of uranium mining, and renewable energy also threatens that.

At least with Metallica, we could laugh at the irony of a band regularly releasing songs about anarchy crying about piracy.

I assume they’ve seen companies talk about revenue vs profit, and think they can claim there’s a difference between earnings and income.

In a few years: “Grandpa, what the fuck is snow?”

If it helps, there’s very little that carries over between the two games. Without any spoilers, you lose your gear at the start of the BG2, most of which doesn’t carry over anyway. You will start with the level you finished BG1 with, but BG2 boosts brand new characters to a certain level anyway. And I don’t think the games track decisions made throughout like modern RPGs do.

That said, I played it years before Beamdog released that interlude DLC, so maybe things have changed in their Enhanced releases of the games.

They’re still working on Daredevil though. They had to replace the showrunners because they were developing it as an episodic court drama rather than a Daredevil show to follow on from the Netflix series.

That’s an oversimplification. All works are derivative to some extent. There’s a huge difference between taking inspiration from something, to taking the characters and setting from something. Particularly if you’re intending to make a profit.

If an author makes something that a large number of people enjoy, why shouldn’t they be able to make money off it for the rest of their life? Why exactly should an individual give up the rights to their creation simply so that someone else can use their characters and their worlds?

To be clear, I’m talking solely on an individual level. I think the system we have where a corporation can own an idea is very broken. I’m also talking about this from a perspective of the world we currently live in. In an ideal world where money wasn’t the endgame for survival, ideas would flow more freely and nobody would need to care. But that’s not the world we live in.

I think an argument could be made to set it to the date of death of the author. I agree with the other guy that it should only apply to commercial works though.

I also don’t think that the copyright should be transferable. The trading of ideas is an absurd concept to me. But then us humans do a lot of absurd things so I guess it’s just par for the course.

On top of the tracking within the ads themselves, you also have all of the general usage data that Google sells. They’re double-dipping.

How is it more weird to get milk from intelligent animals that are capable of giving consent?

Shadowheart does mind sharing, depending who it is. Not at all happy sharing with Lae’zel.

Editor: The article is great! All we need now is a quote from social media and we can publish.

Journalist: We haven’t been able to find anything suitable, everyone thinks this story is satire.

Editor: Then just post one yourself and then quote that! But don’t reference your name, that’ll be a dead giveaway.