Most important here is the dabbing.

Yep I’m somehow in a reality where everyone is loved by Crackhappy, but no one I know knows about this.

I don’t have a source on hand, but I’m sure that a pronounced chin has been found in studies as male attractiveness symbol

Also what no one has said yet, if you put two identical people next to each other, same mindset, same character, same visuals etc etc, but the one is wealthy and the other is poor, for 99% of people the wealthier one is more sexually attractive. Our brains view access to resources as a desirable quality.

And so, why would a rom com that is literally supposed to be about attractive people, make them purposefully less attractive? There’s basically no reason.

For example.

But honestly I was more joking. The thing that makes most projects useful is the developers developing it, and they can’t clone that

Not sure what you’re actually losing on YouTube though… You go fullscreen quickly anyway. And if I put two windows side by side I just disable the tab because I’m likely doing it for a reason to have two specific pages on them, actually giving more screenspace because I don’t have the bar at the top either.

Which website actually has a layout that makes use of your extra space, and doesn’t center the content with empty space on the left and right side? I actually have barely ever noticed a case where it was useful

They’re not supposed to, it’s just about blocking them from using the software :)

The real solution is to include a few tiananmenSquare variables in all the repositories. Either they exclude the entire repository or just the specific file, in either case the entire project may be unusable.

I was not able to express myself clearly enough that you understand what I was talking about. Should I try again or do you not care?

With Proton, a large majority of games run on Linux, and most even better than on windows.

“Moderate” should not be a criterion for choosing anything. Rather you should choose the approach that has the best score when comparing reasons for and reasons against it, i.e. making a rational decision based on the available evidence.

The reason your “middle of the road” approach doesn’t make sense is because if you really decide like that, one side just has to get more and more extreme for you to “sympathize” with their side, since suddenly the middle will shift in their direction. You can be easily manipulated that way.

Huh I thought I’ve been downloading stuff with ipfs from them the whole time

What would theoretically happen if they refused?

A repetition of the truth is always valuable. Not everyone fully understands how broken our society is. Even if just 0.1% read the comment and understand something new, it was valuable. Even if it’s just a reminder, it was valuable.

On the other hand, your comment is not valuable 100% of the time. Complaining about something generally true being there, which you could just ignore if you already know it, is absolutely useless. In fact, it’s even negative value, because if your complaint was followed and someone came to the thread without the knowledge, they’d be denied an opportunity to learn.

Are you a bot? This answer is so generic and not even addressing OP.

Honestly I can’t see why you’d choose average, non-wealthy. If you want quiet and peaceful, you’re sure to get it when wealthy, just pay for a large residence and security on the outskirts, then stay inside. Use disguises/body doubles when going out. Except for a little organizational overhead, which you can also pay people to do for you, you can have everything you want when you’re famous and wealthy.

I have no idea how selection works anywhere else, since I only ever used gimp.

For me, I don’t understand this meme, selection seems to work very intuitively, it seems to do what I expect it to do.

I don’t think there’s any real will to update Minecraft to be objectively better anymore. Specific devs might still care, but management is in power and just extracting maximum value. Your thoughts are great but I’m sure they’re never going to get in official.

But the thing is, we don’t need to develop products. New products are just further resource usage, more greenhouse gasses, more “infinite growth”. Also, a company or individual having “an edge” in competition by developing something first is simply waste of resources. Now only they are allowed to improve upon it, make it more efficient, whatever. If this didn’t exist, yea they’d be incentivized less to create it in the first place, but also now everyone could take it and make it better.

We have to go away from thinking as individuals in the direction of thinking as humanity.