Either she’s like the rest of us and sometimes does irrational and dramatic things when angry, or she has an undiagnosed mental health disorder involving paranoia.
Apparently those are the options.
Either she’s like the rest of us and sometimes does irrational and dramatic things when angry, or she has an undiagnosed mental health disorder involving paranoia.
Apparently those are the options.
It’s probably she was upset that he didn’t follow through with what he promised. In her anger she came up with a bunch of hypotheticals to grill him about. The real issue is she thinks he doesn’t care enough to meet her where he said he would.
What about being overly dramatic in the comments section about someone else’s minor spat with his girlfriend. Is that manipulative?
“Both sides” people claim there are no important differences between the candidates or parties. They say it doesn’t matter who you vote for.
There are massive differences between the candidates. It does matter who you vote for. Did this article say differently?
In sans serif fonts, it can be hard to distinguish capital i from lowercase L.
I can explain why this is happening, but I’d rather allow a woman to do that.
So do you stand by Hezbollah are not terrorists? Is it for the reason I gave or some other one?
Depends how you define terrorism, I guess. Bombing a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires would be terrorist to most, but I suppose a die-hard Jew hater would consider all Jewish people as complicit in Israel’s occupation of Southern Lebanon.
Non-sleepers of Lemmy, RIP.
A bar is 100,000 Pa or 100.000 Pa. Why not use KPa? Why set a separate unit to be 1E+05?
I searched for an editorial board opinion in the New York Times which said Trump should withdraw from the Republican ticket because he lied throughout the debate, but I couldn’t find one. Why didn’t they write one?
Because of the implication?
Maybe it should have been Target Archery to avoid confusion?
Biden and Trump are no Andrew Tate, amirite? Well, Trump is not too far off.
Sarcasm is a tool used by imperialists to undermine free peoples.
To an extent, but you expect demands for hegemony from western imperialists.
In the Hong Kong case, it’s the government - an agent of the people - which is just enforcing the desire of the people to praise the revolution. It’s not that the kids can’t sing softly. It’s that if they sing softly it’s because of the lingering influence of the colonizers. Therefore they need re-education until their minds are properly free.
That sounds like a bunch of baloney.
From the article:
The article was the cover of the Sunday business feature section. Trump did not cut it out to read it and there is no indication that he was even aware of its existence. It is resting on top of a pile of other newspaper sections, which suggests its placement is coincidental.
Reminds me of this one time at Bandwagon…
Maybe he should file a police report for the torture.