At worst you’d be offending thin-skinned crackers, but it’s unlikely you’d even offend them if you’re a cracker.
As a cracker: no. Only cringe losers give a fuck about being called cracker.
Edit: and if you’re worried about offending Black people, I think you don’t need to worry, considering the idea that slaves/Black Americans coined/popularized the term.
Well, I would agree that literacy rates are lower here.
To be fair, I am going off media representation of what is considered “developing” (well, media representation of “3rd world”, anyway).
But, simply look up HDI scores for the US states and you will see that there is no comparison here.
Edit: link for your benefit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_Human_Development_Index_score
Paragauy was like .731 or something, for reference.
That’s not a red herring, that’s a strawman. A red herring is a narrative plot device.
Which ones? I live in a low income, rural area in a red state. It is nothing like a 3rd world country, just not even remotely close. Yet.
You should have replied to that person, then.
This take is just incredibly dumb. No one would ever interpret it that way. They are doing this because they are bad people.
Black and white. There is no gray here.
deleted by creator
I mean, it’s not an influencer thing, it’s a common sense thing. His username on twitch used to be NinjasHyper. Common sense dictates that this is a fairly normal username because of the nature of usernames. Common sense also dictates that when addressing someone who you only know by the internet moniker of “NinjasHyper”, you’re going to call them Ninja or Hyper.
Surely you recognize that this incentivizes greedy people (who are probably bad parents) to have more children more-so than it incentivizes responsible people?
From my perspective, anyway, I feel that this is more likely to cause more children to suffer.
Well, what in this comment do you consider content? I don’t understand why the comment you’ve made here is more “content” than answering a question.
Check my history and you’ll see I’m also engaging with, and actually being WAYYYYY meaner to, the guy that was being a dick to you. Kinda embarrassed him tbh.
I don’t see why you would think it’s creepy. It’s not like I’m personally interested in you or your life. I just wondered why you seemed to be inconsistent about it.
Well, at first it was funny to watch. I also have an “internet justice boner”, so it felt good to call you out for asking and then saying nobody cared. Also funny. I like being snide. But then, you responded to me and seemingly tried to belittle me for being mildly interested in a conversation on a forum. You seem pretty emotionally invested, though. Like I said, you responded to them when they weren’t even talking to you. Someone who wasn’t emotionally invested would probably block and move on, or even just ignore it. But instead, you’ve attempted to defend yourself (doth protest too much!) and then asked me for further interaction.
Man, you should probably reassess this whole situation, huh? Or you can feel free to keep getting emotional and respond to me. It won’t make you feel better, though. Probably worse, if anything, because it’s pretty easy to see that I am correct and so it’s just going to keep bothering you when I respond. Sorry, like I said, I enjoy being snide.
Your best bet is probably to either block me or ignore me.
To be fair, you’re commenting all over this thread. I was genuinely interested in why one message wouldn’t have your little copy paste, if there was any significance in that. I do think the whole thing is silly, but it was genuine curiosity.
Why are you so emotionally invested in this? You replied to them replying to someone else. Why are you so upset? If it’s a sovcit, who cares about their stupid bullshit? Why did you continue to interact by replying to a reply that wasn’t directed at you? If it’s a troll, why do you care?
But yeah, man, it’s pretty entertaining to read arguments between goobers.
Consider lightening up? Save your vitriol for stuff that matters, maybe?
Is this comment not under the license?
You literally asked
I think they’re saying the anti-Trump conservatives should call them in on other conservatives.
No, you see, some people believe all murder (except in the case of genuine, immediate self-defense) is immoral. They feel this way, probably, because they think all life is precious or maybe that everyone should have the opportunity to rehabilitate. Or maybe some mix of both, or even another reason.
I think we should kill evil people, personally. I’m not saying I believe in capital punishment, though, except in the case of the most heinous, malicious crimes. But Brian Thompson definitely deserved to die a lot more than his murderer does.
Edit: oh to clarify, what I meant to say but kinda ranted off topic from, is that the other person is saying even if you killed all the other evil people, you would be evil for killing them, therefore you wouldn’t have killed ALL the evil people.
It’s significantly different in America. I think doordash has different payment structures in Europe bcos of laws whereas, in most of America, drivers are paid next to nothing. It’s like tipping culture with American service workers, except way worse.
So like, inflated prices (set by the restaurant and optional, but often done to make up for doordash’s cut) + delivery fee (pocketed by doordash of course!) + ridiculous tip bcos now I gotta pay this driver’s livable wage.
Door dash really is an unsustainable business. It’s probably gonna tank in the next 5 years, I’d bet.
You just linked back to the article from the OP?
Whose house are you protesting outside of?