Lsjbot generates articles by taking information from online databases, mostly on biology and geography, and fitting the data into a set number of pre-written sentences.

Volunteers who create and maintain Wikipedia, called Wikipedians, found many of the Cebuano-language pages had grammatical and sometimes factual errors, thanks to imperfect translations.

Punish them how?

Ah, of course, I was looking at the English Wikipedia article. Still, the Swedish article mentions Les Bronzés, no?

Which article is this?

Well, you still managed to check it, no?

I just checked the articles for “Sällskapsresan” and “French Fried Vacation”. The only edit that was reverted (or at least the only edit whose author would’ve been notified by the revert) changed “Norwegian” to “German” on the former page. I also didn’t find “is on DVD for exceptionally cheap” anywhere. None of these articles are protected (i.e. “locked”) either. Which article did this happen on?

You can ask me about sources. We probably all know what “reliable” means, and claims may cite any reliable source (even sources written by the subject of the article if the fact is uncontroversial). However, for an article to be included in Wikipedia, and mainly so that it’s possible for the article to be improved so that it conforms with Wikipedia’s guidelines, articles must pass “notability” (a misnomer, see efforts to change its name); the biggest component of notability that’s most often failed is that there is enough coverage in reliable sources not written by the subject, and that’s precisely so that we won’t have an article that’s entirely the subject’s own puffery that turns out to be false or egregiously biased. (Not an admin because I probably have too short a temper, but nonetheless experienced.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Scam_warning

What does the article mean “Juniper Networks, despite being a “Good Article”, is also mostly PR”? It seems like a fine article to me, and as the article mentioned, Tinucherian disclosed his COI and appropriately sought review for edits in this case (though as the article also mentions, he’s edited other articles the wrong way).

This. This is the way. Even if the APY is just 4% I get 40k free.

During reconstruction and until Jim Crow, the Republicans had a base in the South. And limited government and regulation isn’t a geographical belief but flipped between the two parties anyways, even before the Southern strategy, as we can see in the 20s. Northern Democratic Party was always a thing, and in fact its splitting of the vote against Southern Democrats was one of the reasons Lincoln won his first election.

I think we have similar amounts of activity levels, and my screen time on this PWA for a day I was entirely on my phone for this was 12 minutes

I don’t understand how that isn’t the same thing (though I of course agree that it’s not about literally releasing v3). “why lemmy so slow development dessaline stop wasting time using your own product move your ass”

deleted by creator

Stating it was his intent would draw attention away from so much more of the focus on Trump’s havoc. “his speech technically isn’t a filibuster because they’re debating a confirmation” doesn’t sound like “it’s coincidental” to me.

ackshually it’s saataa andaagii

no the real verse is just fantasizing about having sex with some conservative anchor

https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/appers/comments/83j49o/new_conservative_rap_idea

@impudentmortal@lemmy.world @ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world @agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works

deleted by creator

North America, of course! /j

They are only getting the money when they implement each set of features.