From the articles…
The union is so far being mum on the details of the agreement, which will likely emerge in the next few days prior to the union’s ratification vote.
I wonder why?
Because this is how it’s done. They don’t shout it all from the rooftops until everything is nice and tidy.
Seems worth a victory lap though, especially considering how hard they worked on it.
It’s only the tentative agreement. This is how it goes every time. Once they finalize it and all everyone has signed, then they will release the details. It could still be reversed at this stage.
Once they finalize it and all everyone has signed, then they will release the details.
From the article…
The union is so far being mum on the details of the agreement, which will likely emerge in the next few days prior to the union’s ratification vote.
You just want to argue, don’t you? They never announce the details right away. The details may come out but the official announcement won’t be until after it’s finalized. Same thing happened with the writers strike. The article says the details may emerge, not be officially announced.
You just want to argue, don’t you?
No, not at all. I thought we were having a conversation.
Once they finalize it and all everyone has signed, then they will release the details.
I mean that’s what you said, which just seemed the contradict what was said in the story, …
The union is so far being mum on the details of the agreement, which will likely emerge in the next few days prior to the union’s ratification vote.
, so I mentioned that in the hope that you would elaborate on that, by either saying you’re incorrect, or that the story was incorrect for some reason.
If someone’s seeking a correction doesn’t automatically mean they want argumentative combat with you, they just want to resolve the discrepancy.
Sometimes someone will argue a technicality just to try to appear the smarter person. You’re just being a pedant at this point.
I mean that’s what you said, which just seemed the contradict what was said in the story, …
But it doesn’t, though. The article says the details will likely emerge. Again, that doesn’t mean announced or released by SAG-AFTRA. The writer of the article is not a spokesperson for SAG-AFTRA.
, so I mentioned that in the hope that you would elaborate on that, by either saying you’re incorrect, or that the story was incorrect for some reason.
Exactly, you’re looking to win an argument. Neither what I said nor the article are incorrect. They are different statements.
If they don’t ratify it then it’s not a victory is it?
If they don’t ratify it then it’s not a victory is it?
From the article…
The union is so far being mum on the details of the agreement, which will likely emerge in the next few days prior to the union’s ratification vote.
