Supporters absorb former US president’s strategy of inverting accusations against him and turning them on his accuser. To his fans, Trump is the saviour of democracy

Snow was falling, lightly dusting the tables full of “Jesus is my savior, Trump is my president” and “Fight for Trump” and other “Make America great again” regalia. Still, in subzero temperatures, people waited in a long and winding line on Saturday for a chance to see their greatest showman.

Donald Trump, the former US president, was about to hold the biggest campaign rally yet in New Hampshire’s primary elections, where victory would put him within touching distance of the 2024 Republican nomination – and trigger renewed warnings that democracy itself will be on the ballot in November.

But his ardent supporters in Manchester, New Hampshire, saw things differently – 180 degrees differently. In their view it is Joe Biden who acts like an autocrat and Trump who is the saviour of the constitutional republic.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, everything Trump accuses his opponents of, he usually does himself. But, I guess it’s not even a revelation that he plans to be a dictator, since he kind of already said that fully out loud.

  • watson387@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess when they’re willing it isn’t brainwash, but they definitely live in an alternate reality from everyone else.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      its projection.

      people have been pointing out how he wants to be a dictator, so he is claiming thats what biden arleady is. in this way, his idea doesnt sound as crazy as it.

      conservatives are master at projection, if they are claiming someone did something theres a reasonable chance they are doing it themselves.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s not a sophisticated trick, and it works because liberals are too cowardly to call it out

          • squiblet@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why not… their religion tells them that it’s a virtue to believe as hard as possible in fantastical stories that have no evidence supporting them.

        • Sunforged@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not really the problem. The problem is liberals failure to deliver meaningful change to worker’s lives when they have majorities. The best they can do when they win at the ballot is deliver conservative bills in sheep’s clothing like Obamacare or Wall Street deregulation.

          The biggest difference is Dems ability to not run a deficit, but apparently that’s to abstract for voters to care about as it doesn’t materially impact them. Even then what is the point to a balanced budget when it includes military spending like this, a response like this when the free option is stopping an allies from continuing a genocide?

          So many bigger issues that “calling out” hypocrisy. Truly the only thing that can stop Trump is a good headline of how Biden “slammed” him.

  • squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Conservatives in 2014 insisted “Obama is a DICTATOR!” but like many things they say, none could explain what he did to make them say that.

  • Introversion@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone still supporting this man is too dumb to be allowed to participate in democracy. What idiots. Jesus wept.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly I just see this all as a case for the abolition of the office of president.

    There should be government ministers who each attend to the leadership of various necessary departments, and the necessity of a leader in crisis should be a position created during that state of crisis and then nixxed on its resolution. Also, there should be redundancy, both for the sake of making sure someone’s always able to step into a vital role, but also for accountability’s sake making sure no one person can sign orders to conceal information which would serve the public interest better in the open.