• Thatsalotofpotatoes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because it’s a terrible idea? Elections are already heavily weighted towards name recognition. What are people who can’t even be bothered to go out to vote going to offer to the process?

    • Gigan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s true, you can require them to vote, but you can’t require them to be informed.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure in Australia you can just turn in a blank ballot. But yeah, compulsory voting is kind of odd.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the simplest solution to fight voter disenfranchisement. It stops parties from trying to play that particular stupid game.

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The alternative is voter suppression, which leads to unequal access. Also, given that more passionate individuals are gonna seek out a ballot vs. others, the result is going to be skewed in favor of those passionate people regardless of their understanding of reality or truthfullness.

    • Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It forces politics to the centre. Parties put a huge amount of effort into ‘bringing out the vote’, and do things to appeal to the fringe which is how you get characters like Trump finding success. When this isn’t a concern, parties can focus on policies that appeal to the majority of people rather than fringe groups that they can use to guarantee voter turnout.