The claim is a major departure for the service, which has long been known as a destination for posting short snippets of text.

    • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      66
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Guys, I think he’s just trolling humanity. If he’s actually trolling, I think he earned my respect. He’d be the biggest troll humanity has and will ever know. Like, the cheer magnitude, the execution… damn.

      • Plopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        No troll ever deserved respect for trolling. And I say that as someone who occasionally engages in innocent trolling.

        • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He’s obviously not trolling the whole planet, it was a joke… but people hate him so much that they even downvote hypothetical sarcastic imaginary praise

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My theory is he’s pulling a zero requiem. He watches anime, so he’s probably watched code geas - it’s a very popular futuristic anime after all

        First he became the symbol of the useful billionaire, the Tony Stark guy who’s going to save humanity, because he’s a futurist with the power of money. He learns everything about his companies the way a kid learns every stat about their model car, and actually does weirdly good as a hype man. He gives off the awkwardness of an engineer

        After he meets Trump in the white house, he realizes how close we are to the brink. The fact that billionaires own all our media has led to existential danger, where truth doesn’t matter and money speaks

        So, there’s a plan for a group of individuals to buy Twitter. There’s text logs of this - he was invited into a group planning to buy it together for the good of humanity, but it took all of 5 minutes for them to start carving holes in the ideology, so he backs out.

        He then announced the intention to buy, trapping him in a situation where he was forced to go through with it… He struggled a bit, but not that hard really

        So then comes the plan. He takes over, and every two weeks or so, he makes an impulsive decision showing zero understanding of the company. One idiotic decision at a time, spread out long enough to remind people “I’m still here, and I’m still ruining a major platform for public discourse!”

        People start to realize he’s actually kind of dumb and pretty racist… Even the fanboys are getting quieter and quieter in defending him. It’s becoming public knowledge he isn’t a Tesla or spaceX founder, he came in as an investor when they already had a plan

        He’s burning up half his fortune in an effort to show us all what a billionaire is. He’s not a businessman, he went to college to learn programming but doesn’t understand the basics of software, he’s hated by pretty much everyone in his personal life, and every company he’s tried to build from scratch has been a disaster. He lies constantly, in ways that will eventually come to light.

        This guy was able to buy Twitter, just because he invested in a company that bought and sold PayPal (after kicking him out for being unbearable). He’s showing us all that billionaires are an existential danger to mankind, even the “good” ones.

        Or, maybe he’s just having a midlife crisis and has a compulsive need for attention. One of the two.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “What if we ignored what made our platform successful and instead tried to force our product into a already crowded market?” Elon Musk, Tech genius

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Disney’s not hurting. They just posted bigger profits than ever this past year and expect to exceed that by several billion this year.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol, twitter was brilliant when it was 144 character text messages. Then it got ruined by adding photos. Now it is going the rest of the way down the tubes by becoming becoming video first. Ugh.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yea back when it needed that limit because the whole point was to text it over SMS and you could post with any SMS capable phone lol

      That was fun and unique, now it’s just…boring? Just another social media site, it’s only defining thing is it’s (declining) size and reach

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        SMS was the original reason, but the side effect of forcing people to condense their thoughts into a couple sentences was pretty wonderful. Especially for an open ended community where anyone can talk about anything.

        • Chriswild@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree with you simply because brevity is nice but not at the expense of nuance. Having to try to follow a string of tweets because one simply can’t suffice is awful.

          • Gamoc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t understand the difficulty, the series of tweets are all replies to the previous tweet in the chain. Where’s the difficulty?

            • Chriswild@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Likewise I don’t understand the difficulty in reading more than 140 characters.

              But I’ve never used Twitter so when I experience the platform it’s through screen caps of tweets. Instead of having paragraphs and cohesive formatting it reads like a programmer who writes code all in one line. Sure, it can be done and it can be read but it’s fucking awful that it isn’t formatted correctly so that it is more clear.

              • Gamoc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s formatted how you’d expect if you’ve a timeline on anything, most recent at the top though, right?

                • Chriswild@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Thats not formatting. That’s like reading a book transcribed on post-it notes and calling it a format. It can be ordered, yes but I’m talking about paragraphs and complete sentences.

        • flipht@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wonderful in theory, but in practice it’s a dumpster fire. Quick, mainstreamm-acceptable takes are incentived, and nuanced, alternative viewpoints are nearly impossible.

          If it were all for hobby stuff, it would be fine, but when this is how most people get their news, it’s not good.

    • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey at least photos worked…

      Video playback doesn’t work half the time, and the other half the time it insists on 140p playback and then freezes.

      They’re doubling down on something they’ve been failing at for years.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And with this brilliant move they are going to increase bandwidth and strange expenses. There’s a reason why it’s so hard to compete with YouTube.

  • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course let’s take a platform that barely holds itself together to show just text and let’s pivot it to be the most technical demanding and expensive kind of service. It will work fine, I’m sure.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only thing worse than its video player are the literal nazis on the site, has he tried watching video there? To call it dogshit would be an insult to dogshit, which can presumably be useful as fertilizer.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s funny how Tucker Carlson thought he could just do his show on Twitter and basically instantly lost his entire audience.

    • Technus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No no no you’ve got it all wrong:

      The Nazis are supposed to be a feature of the platform.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Paradox of tolerance and all that. You want a tolerant site? Can’t allow Nazis.

        Secondly, there was a wave of banning of leftists and journalists recently, it’s very much only free speech for the right there.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The paradox of tolerance is a gross misunderstanding of the concept of tolerance

          You tolerate your gay coworker - you treat them like a coworker. If any of your coworkers make inappropriate sexual comments or unwanted advances, that’s not okay. You respond appropriately, such as expressing your discomfort to them or going to hr or the police. There’s no conflict

          You tolerate racists - so long as they stay within the social contract, they’re allowed to hold whatever they want in their hearts.

          But if they violate the social contract, such as by saying racist things, you respond appropriately.

          If someone believes Nazi ideas deep down, you tolerate them. If Nazis want to organize, spread their ideals, or do Nazi things, you respond appropriately.

          It’s that simple.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s amazing watching a platform with no substantial competitor kill itself so badly. AltaVista was killed by Google, MySpace was killed by Facebook, Twitter is killed by the ramblings of the lunatic who bought it.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You seem to be taking pleasure in it, but the fact is this was the plan from the moment he was locked into the purchase. Buy the business, run it into the ground, destroy the platform that people use to organise on. On the way down, try a bunch of shady shit and see what they can get away with - this will be the new standard for any platform that comes next.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s been the outcome, but I think you’re dramatically overestimating Musk if you think that was his intent.

        It seems clear to me that he’s of below average intelligence with an overinflated, incredibly fragile ego.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It wasn’t his intent when he posted about wanting to buy the company, but after the SEC forced him to buy, and once he formed a coalition to buy it, the plan became to kill the business off with a leveraged buyout.

          Make no mistake, Twitter isn’t dying because of Musk’s mismanagement, it’s dying because it was saddled with $13bn of debt that it could never have hoped to pay back. The mismanagement is just a show to provide deniability.

          That isn’t to say that Musk is some kind of genius, just that he’s a clown playing his role.

  • Coach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought Xitter was going to be a bank! Honestly, who can follow the mentally-ill, cocaine-fueled ramblings of this man-baby?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s an interesting claim.

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen a platform struggle more with video than Twitter. Everything looks like it’s using RealPlayer. It’s the only platform where the Japanese wouldn’t have to censor their porn before uploading.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        And QuickTime. You can still get both of these. I can only imagine they’re visited by people that’ve just come out of a 20 year coma and need something to play their .avi files on…

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt their server infrastructure will hold after all the shenanigans Elmo pulled with it.

      Video streaming is a lot more taxing than text.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meta already did the “pivot to video” scam. I doubt most media outlets are going to fall for it again.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Xitter inflates its video metrics - scrolling past a video is the same as watching it. So yeah, basically the same playbook.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t visit twitter/X for a while. A “video-first platform” typically supports live streams, captions/subtitles and 4k videos. Does X supports these?

    • ka-chow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Best I can give you is low quality videos with a max length of 2:20 that occasionally lose audio sync, and sometimes the audio decides it doesn’t want to work at all.