• IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fungi won’t trade if the tree is not giving enough nutrients. So while they don’t trade for profit they sure as hell aren’t engaging in charity.

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There likely could be other benefits to them sharing such as:

      1. when there is more than they can use, particularly that the mushroom does not like in their environment
      2. producing more leaves is likely highly beneficial for the mushroom, for shade both living and fallen, nutrients and cover with fallen leaves.

      Similar for the tree, but also mushrooms are recycling minerals from dead material.

      I don’t know if there’d be “stingy” trees (aside from vastly different nutrient needs), I could see it more of miscommunication or having too much difference with language/biologic pathways. EDIT: Also I gotta imagine that giant trees don’t even bother counting it for mushrooms so long as they aren’t stressed. Sugar water is in the grid, take as much as you want.

        • kay@lemmings.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Flat out no. There is no competition and they’re literally providing what they are capable of to take care of the others’ need. Mutual aid is not a marketplace and the fact you instinctually thought of it that way tells me you need a book on capitalist realism.