• Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, really, how could anyone think that the abilities to eat and to see are in any way related to human health?

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can see their point if instead of being fleshy humans, we are androids without mouths and cameras instead of eyes.

      Then they can collect all the premiums and not have to pay out! Brilliant business strategy. Time to start converting people into robots.

  • crazycaveman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    And ears. Not covered (in the USA, at least) because “just about everyone suffers hearing loss at some point in their life” (aka not a profit maker) so might as well not cover it at all for anyone, including those with profound loss from birth…

    • zeroblood@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Canada too. At least I can get a cheap pair of glasses online, but my god is the dentist ever expensive.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can get teeth online, too. Even if they’re not the highest quality, they usually still have a reasonable amount of flavor left on them.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The visible state of a person’s teeth is far too useful a proxy for their position in the socioeconomic hierarchy to ever be sacrificed by making dental care affordable.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are pretty close. The American Medical Association, (AMA), and the American Dental Association, (ADA), are the 2 different medical organizations that represent each group. Originally, they tried to set up one association but the dentists decided to form their own group. This has lead to group bargaining with insurance companies. Which leads to separate policies being needed.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You missed the part where Dentists are even greedier than your average Medical Professional.

        They remain separate because Dentist groups spend Million Bribing Politicians Lobbying every year to keep it that way.