Summary

A federal employee revealed that Elon Musk’s DOGE conducted 15-minute interviews where staff had to “justify their existence” to “college freshers.”

After Musk’s visit, he called for a 50% agency cut, with the bottom 30% of performers facing layoffs.

Supervisors must now submit justification forms for employees.

The speaker also claimed Musk, his “wife,” and child are living inside the agency.

  • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oh, I know this one! The question for this answer is: “What is the most stupid way to find inefficiencies that you can think of?” for 200!

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Musk’s efficiency theater hits new lows: federal staff grilled by interns in glorified speed-dating sessions to “justify existence.” That 50% cut? Pure corporate darwinism—sacrificing the “bottom” 30% to feed his messiah complex.

    Justification forms? Bureaucratic kabuki for supervisors moonlighting as HR inquisitors. And of course he’s camping in the office—a taxpayer-funded vanlife arc while his empire of hype unravels.

    Pro tip: Submit a form titled “Why Mars Needs Layoffs First” and watch the nepo-bots short-circuit.

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    1 day ago

    The speaker also claimed Musk, his “wife,” and child are living inside the agency.

    The richest man on the planet and he’s constantly acting like a homeless squatter.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      1 day ago

      He thinks it makes him look “dedicated” and hard working. Like randomly mashing on his keyboard during conference calls with Twitter employees.

        • Glifted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well sure, but he’s not particularly bright and he doesn’t surround himself with competence. I’d say if you went with a group and were well prepared you could probably make it happen.

          To clarify I’m not advocating someone do this. Merely surprized no one has tried

          • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It’s because most of the people who have access, or would have access, are comfortable. The majority of people who undertake actions that will render them Public Enemy #1 are in a religious fervor, situations they think are unbearable or will end them anyway, or are hyped by the (sometimes real) thought that they are acting with the social support of everyone they care about. Luigi, as an example, supposedly suffers from horrible pain in his back, and likely thought that most agreed with him on the evil qualities of healthcare insurers.

            Government employees are generally well paid and have good benefits. They’ll have families or significant mental/emotional investments in things that they don’t want to see suffer because of their actions. Even in the most liberal/progressive of areas, there will also be enough colleagues/associates around that would lick trump’s feces to ruin thoughts that ‘the majority’ of people would support their actions. The ones who are about to be fired may be pushed into a category above, but by that point they’ll have that potential access cut off.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 day ago

    If anyone has ever worked for a bad company where McKinsey or Deloitte comes in, this is what it’s like.

    A bunch of dumb know-it-alls come in, “uncover” a bunch of already documented stuff that everyone already knows about, some to stupid conclusion based upon data with no context, them they give terrible advice to the dumb person and hired them, and that dumb person was probably already to blame for many of the problems that needed fixing.

    The consultant’s goal is usually never to fix organization. Their goal is to profit of selling people a perceived fix, and to add a big brand name to their CV.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That’s exactly why I kept telling people to stop promoting Pete Buttigeig as if he was this great guy. He was a McKinsey lawyer. Just because you’re gay and a Democrat does not in any way mean you’re a good person. But somehow that was the reasoning people operated under.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Pete wasn’t a lawyer and left that place after 2.5 years. A lot of people take a job there after college because working with a lot of different companies sounds cool. Then you get in and realize that place sucks.

        The ones who leave aren’t the people you worry about. You worry about the assholes who like that place and strive to become a parter.

    • fitgse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 day ago

      The goal for management is to pass the blame on to consultants. “We” didn’t make this choice, the consultant did.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Just punch the dudes in the fucken face! Where is this perceived authority coming from!? They all look like Gen Z stereotypes bad. Like why would you give a fuck what those dudes say?

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I fucking hate this so very much. Running our government like the very worst caricature of douchebro asshattery in tech.

    As if these incel high schoolers know the first fucking thing about anything…

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    ‘fuck off’ would be my initial response, my follow-up response, and my closing statement.

  • psmgx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    “fresher’s” is a term in Indian English, not in the US.

    They’re “Freshmen”.

    While I’m sure DOGE is young assholes, this article strikes me as dubious.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Latin times isn’t a great source but there’s corroborating stories and video out there.

    • dilroopgill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      yep a lot of indians saw the fake indian burner accounts trend and decided its time we make scam conservative accounts , that indian in your dms or comments is probably someone you know pretending to be an indian to harass you, learning that shit was so dissapointing , and it wasnt a small trend either

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Listen, I talk to the taxpayers so the cabinet members don’t have to! I have people skills! I am good at dealing with people!”

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The Bobs were finding actual waste and fraud, as well as people who deserved better positions. If anything Musk and friends are acting out the scene with the printer in the field, except the printer was functional.