• ludicolo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    In other news, shit spewing liar spews more shit and lies to get more of your money.

    He thinks they’re on the wrong side of history my ass. He doesn’t care. He never cared. He will never care. The open source you and I know is completely different than the “open source” this chucklefuck is probably selling you on. “We need to figure out a different open source strategy” should be the biggest indicator here. Take everything he and his circlejerk says with the biggest fucking mountain of salt you can dream of and double it.

    • JOMusic@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah totally agree. He has proven to be one of the slimiest people on the scene. I mean, he is pretty much throwing his colleagues under the bus in this statement too lol

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Lol. They didn’t even publish weights since GPT2. And weights are not enough for open source.

  • suoko@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    We have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek…

    But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?

    • JOMusic@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      OpenAI was started to be as open as possible, and to prevent the kinds of capitalism-driven Closed-AI development that they have now themselves become.

      My personal opinion is that closed AI systems are only good if the owners are trustworthy. And in the long-run, no single owner can be trusted. There are risks with letting everyone copy and customize AI, however the worse danger is that the power gets too centralized with one single company.

      • davel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        OpenAI was started to be as open as possible, and to prevent the kinds of capitalism-driven Closed-AI development that they have now themselves become.

        No, that was what OpenAI said its goals originally were. They were lying. They always intended for it to become a capitalist venture. Anyone who listens to Tech Won’t Save Us or This Machine Kills or Team Human have known all along. Or anyone like me who’s been in the industry for thirty years.