how much could minor shoplifting add to the economy if:
- it was only targeting businesses that ship their profits offshore and/or avoid paying local taxes;
- the shoplifted items were items that were going to be purchased; and
- monetary savings redistributed to local businesses?
Would not help at all.
Any damage from “ethical” shoplifting, if that even exist, significant enough not to be just ignored would be turned on shoppers/clients by raising prices or locking down goods.
That would turn into just damage lower income people.
Of course ethical shoplifting exists: stealing bread to feed a starving person or medication to help a sick one, etc.
Yeah, that’s why I wrote “if that even exist”. I can see corner cases where it might be a necessity, but that should never happen in a modern civilized country where medication is free and food accessible to everyone (food banks, kitchens and such).
I mean, in an ideal world, lots of things wouldn’t exist, but we don’t live in an ideal world and there are hungry people in every country, even those with robust food support systems. I live in Germany, where there is a lot of aid for those who are hungry and, whether it’s due to untreated mental health issues (including addiction) or something else, there are plenty of hungry people.
True as well.
My ex girlfriend mother had to steal from supermarkets when her husband ran away and left her and the daughter stranded.
So there are always corner cases.
Does that justify stealing? No, but when no harm is done and was a necessity, I don’t think its wrong to do. You need to survive after all, it’s a failure of society not your fault.
it was only targeting businesses that ship their profits offshore and/or avoid paying local taxes;
This is an oddly specific shoplifting question, almost as if you’re shopping for justifications for a specific concrete action.
nah, i’ve already justified it myself. just curious about the potential maths
Businesses steal so much from us it would probably just bring us to neutral
Yeah, like programs to subsidize the low wages of Walmart workers.
I’m all for supporting people who need it, but if our taxes are going towards food stamps to save Walmart money, then Walmart is just taking my money.
What if I told you that our federal taxes don’t go toward food stamps at all, and in fact pay for nothing?
The cost is not so much in losing the product but in deciding when and how much to invest in increased security. The more shoplifting happens, then the owner has to start investing in more security cameras, security guards and legal costs of dealing with law enforcement and courts. Then no matter what products or items you try to discriminate against, the owners and corporations just raise the prices of everything to cover their costs.
