It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    No it doesn’t sound bad, words don’t need to be thrown away forever just because they’ve been used to describe unfair treatment. I’m so sick of having to relabel so many things that are so far divorced from the social issues they are used to describe. It’s so pointless and has no impact, the code doesn’t care which is master and which is the slave for they are simply descriptive labels.

    Are we supposed to never use the words master or slave ever again?? What’s next?

    My dev friends, no matter their race, all say the exact same thing. We still use master over main, come at us I guess.

  • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    If it’s referring to something like a mother/daughter circuitboard, I’ll use that. If it’s a host/client connection, I’ll use that. If it’s a primary/backup redundancy situation, I’ll use that. And those are just a few examples. There is rarely a good reason to use master/slave nowadays, since most situations already have better descriptors to begin with.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You could but he has a point. The last time I used master/slave was for IDE drives which was 15+ years ago, and even then only because I happened upon a really old system using IDE drives.

        The only thing I see left is “Master” by itself, like master branch. But that makes me think of like a jujitsu master which sounds really cool lol.

        • pingveno@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, that definition of “master” is different than master/slave from what I can tell. Think the master copy of an audio recording. There are plenty of perfectly legit uses of “master,” but there’s no reason to use master/slave in this day and age. It was stupid to start doing so to begin with.

    • x3x3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Changing terminology also creates a mess and lots of confusion. I always want to check out the master branch but some people now started calling it main. I don’t mind either way but constantly changing it is horrible