Edit: Alt Text: Speed limit c arcminutes^2 per steradian.

  • addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    For something that doesn’t run continuously, like eg. a refrigerator, then an average daily usage is more useful, no? “This product draws 1.5 kW with a duty cycle of 0.08” doesn’t really help when comparing efficiencies of potential purchases, you’d need to convert it to electricity consumed in a set period anyway.

    • dmention7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly, it’s a unit of convenience, not a unit of abstract precision.

      Even a unit of “gallons/sqft” could be handy in the right context. If you were trying to design a storage solution for discretely packaged product for example, it could be a figure of merit despite literally factoring out to a unit of length.

      • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I could imagine a scenario where gal/ft² is useful. Like with grocery store shelving figuring shelving and product stacking. If liquid storage containers are stackable then you have have more gallons per square footage of shelf space. Or of they’re not stackable, then taller containers would hold more liquid in the same shelf space than shorter containers with the same footprint.

        Yeah it seems odd to represent something as a volume/area, but that is the relevant information you’re comparing and it’s intuitive how that number changes based on changes to volume as projected onto an area. Bigger number points toward a more efficient use of shelving.

        • booly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s pretty common to use acre inches and acre foot as a unit of volume for measuring water in agriculture, water use, flood mitigation, etc.

          So if we can use area height as a volumetric unit, by not volume/area as a height unit?

    • kittehx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, it’s because watts are joules per second, so kWh are (energy / time) * time. Cancelling the units would be expressing the energy directly in joules.

      • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        But the XKCD mentions kWh/day specifically, in theory the times can cancel out, leaving you with kW

        But instantaneous and average kW are very different, and it would take more time to describe that distinction than to use kWh/day.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    kWh is already an uncanceled unit, drives me nuts even without adding per day

    (Energy / time) * time? fuck you

    • Revonult@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s because the times aren’t the same. Maybe same unit but different context so they can’t be canceled.

      It’s like saying you work 8 Hours/day (Eight hours per day). Both are units of time, but their context is different and their combination forms a new meaning beyond the units.

      1 KWh is using 1KW for one hour. Because of demand pricing the time you use that KW is important. Like in terms of energy grid using a whole ton of power for one minute vs same total over a long time is different and important dispite being the same amount of energy.

      Edit: some phrasing