• BertramDitore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Exactly, and that’s how this court is so tricky. By not fully defining what an “official act” is, they’re claiming the power to decide later. Because that very issue will inevitably reach them after some batshit district court ruling. So they ultimately get to decide regardless, and this court regularly makes up ahistorical and completely absurd justifications that don’t pass the smell test, so we’re doomed.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They do, and it will only be “official” when a Republican does it. Once they control the courts, it’s game over. Nothing short of unstacking the court will avert a fascist dictatorship.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        They remanded to the lower courts to determine that. But like it does have some implication. They definitely did not say everything the president does is an official action.

        • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          And who gets to decide if a lower court decision stands? You guessed it, the Supreme Court. This was always going to be their ultimate decision.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      As far as I can tell, yup. And by official, it basically means anything done while in office, so he could theoretically walk out onto Pennsylvania Avenue, spray a group of protestors holding signs with an M16, and walk back inside with no legal repercussions.