• frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    Two weeks before the party, I say I’m totally in and excited, and then the day of, I remember I don’t want to do that and say I’m pretty sure I’m getting sick. Then B.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Middle Managers and 2nd rate psych students. But, having surveyed my undergraduate classes in the past, about 50% of them believe in astrology so it’s no wonder the Myers-Briggs speaks to them.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Isn’t it meant to be a categorical insight?

        I was always under the impression it’s obviously non-scientific and simply there to explain the broad aspects of a personality to others quickly.

        Maybe that’s the real personality test. Exposing how prone someone is to tribalism over self-reflection based on “I am a…” vs “My outcome was…”

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I mean, some people like BuzzFeed quizzes, but it’s easy to tell that it’s for entertainment, knowing they’re not scientific. When it’s an documented personality test with a long history, it’s easy to assume it’s scientific. But social sciences weren’t all that scientific until the last few decades, anyway.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve only known a handful of psych students, but even as students they knew enough about the Myers-Briggs to recognize it as pseudo-science bullshit. Sad to hear that’s not universal.

        • AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          My Psych degree hangs framed above my toilet. It really brings the room together. I only put partial weight into standardized testing, IQ or personality tests, and I hope other people realize the constraints and fallabilities of these metrics. I don’t detest that they exist. I just hope people don’t horoscope 'em.

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Might vary from school to school. The bigger thing is upbringing, many first gen kids don’t have that going into college so it’s more a task to teach critical thinking to them. More privileged kids get that out the gate, especially if they’re coming from private schools that encourage critical thinking and not following orders / memorization.

          I teach at a place with mostly first gens, so thats how it is.

    • myusernameis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Short story. My company brought in a different working-type consulting group. I decided to try my own experiment and answered the 150 survey completely randomly, didn’t read the questions. Then sat through a 4 hour workshop where most of my colleagues told me it made so much sense I was a [whatever my results were, I forget]." Found out they paid like $10k for the day session, never told anybody what I did.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I always struggle with these tests. Honestly, I like to do A and then immediately B. If anyone from A try to get ahold of me, completely ghosted for no clear reason whatsoever.