• 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Then organise the renters, let them buy the house to transform it into syndicate or cooperative housing. Social apartment construction isn’t impossible.

  • Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    You can still have trees and plant life in low density housing. You don’t need green deserts everywhere.

  • rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Why not prefer apartments in your own town?

    Noise. Neighbours being closer.

      • kier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Nah mate, there should be laws to how much people can live in some area. It’s inhumane to compress so many people in one place. I don’t want every city to be Hong Kong.

  • AKADAP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I spent seven years living in an apartment. I so enjoyed hearing the neighbors having sex, the thumping music they played, the smell of their cigarette smoke inside my apartment with all my windows closed, the random intrusions by management to repair something unrelated to my apartment, the random rent increases. Add this to the fact that I had no space for a work shop to make anything, and paying the equivalent of a mortgage with no equivalent home equity. Some people love apartment life, but it definitely was not for me.

  • biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Do you dare come say this here in Scandinavia please? FYI, you will suffer the date of Vigo the Carpathian, but I promis to erect a nice slab of stone for you.

  • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What is going on in this comments section? Building dense is massively better for the environment than SFH, both in the construction phase and for the life of the units as far more residents can be served with less infrastructure sprawl. It also doesn’t mean that detached housing will suddenly stop existing if we let developers build densely packed housing. Doesn’t even need to be high rises, it can be townhomes, duplexes, five-over-ones, etc. You’ll still be able to get a white picket fence suburban home or a farmhouse on some acreage if you want. In fact, it will become cheaper because all the people who want to live in cities will actually be able to move there and not take up space in that low density area you want to live in.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      People want to live in SFH’s. I just noticed this post from the all feed but it’s not that surprising that people who enjoy living in privacy with space would prefer the status quo and then say as much.

      If I had the money to afford a downtown apartment that was large enough for my 5 member family, I would. I don’t want to live in an apartment complex with nothing to do in the suburbs.

      • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        People want to live in SFHs because cities are currently full of overpriced shoebox apartments with almost no options between that and car dependent suburban sprawl. It’s not for me personally, but townhomes and other mid density developments are perfect for most families and far easier to serve with public transport (see: streetcar suburbs). You can still mix in detached single family housing in urban areas where demand is low enough to make the financials work too.

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Name one good reason the average apartment experience could ever be better than living in a house.

    People live in apartments to afford shelter, you’d be hard-pressed to find one that actually likes it better.

    Sure you can make arguments about the concept of centralized feeling being better for nature, but no one actually wants to do it.

    • Player2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a student, I would rather rent in a modern apartment building than a house. No yard to take care of, closer to other stuff (grocery store is literally across the street), safer, no insects. I would 100% rather have a nice apartment over a meh house.

      • reev@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’d choose a nice apartment over a nice house too. My dream is a nice two story apartment with big windows for lots of light and an open plan living space.

        • Player2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’ve been living in a small one bedroom apartment in a modern 16 floor building for a bit over a year now. The only time I hear my neighbors is when they’re taking their dogs out for walking, you can hear them in the hallway. The hot water pressure is better than any house I’ve lived in in the past. I have a beautiful view outside and my own balcony. These are just some complaints about apartments I’ve heard from other people.

          The reason I compared a nice apartment to a meh house was to be closer in cost, but I agree and would also prefer a nice apartment over a nice house.

  • Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    But instead of a population of 100 with small houses you will get a population of 1000 because they built 10 apartment complexes. I think I’d prefer the small houses didn’t have lawns and left the nice trees and natural growth.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    You know how computers were supposed to make life so easy we’d only have to work a few hours a week, and how that never happened.

    This is the same thing.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    A lot of people are pro-apartmemt before living in one, so here are some fun facts:

    1. Apartments usually have a maintenance cost, that covers as little as possible while still costing a lot. You never really own the flat, the building company does.

    2. You often have a communal garden; it’s looked after by the lowest bidding contractor. Not all flats have balconies, so you are unlikely to have your own.

    3. Fear of fire and flooding - if someone else messes up, your stuff is toast/soaked. Insurance companies love that extra risk, it gives them an excuse to charge more.

    4. No flat has good sound proofing - the baby screaming downstairs at 5am and the thunder of the morbidly obese person upstairs going to the bathroom at 1am will denote your new sleep schedule (i.e. disturbed)

    5. I hope you’re in for deliveries - apartments have no safe spots to leave things.

    6. You will not be able to afford a flat with the same floor space as a house. I’m sorry, welcome to your new coffin.

    7. Good luck drying your laundry (spoiler, your living room is going to have a laundry rack).

    8. Good luck owning a bike (it’s either the bike or your laundry, take your pick).

    9. Vocal intimacy becomes a community event.

    Living in a flat is a pile of little miseries grouped together.